Occupancy Sensing – 9 methods compared

Occupancy Monitoring: Providing accurate data on the number of individuals currently present within a specific space, such as a room, building, bus, exhibition or theme park.

Occupancy counts are used in various applications, including smart buildings, intelligent transportation systems, retail optimisation, event planning, complying with capacity regulations and staff forecasting. They provide valuable data-driven insights to improve efficiency, enhance user experience and and drive cost savings.

1. Video occupancy counting: CCTV cameras plus AI-powered detection software

Tests show video occupancy counting achieves over 98% accuracy(1). Privacy is preserved as the software detects people but doesn’t identify them. It stores only occupancy counts, not any personal data. Video occupancy counting is accurate both inside and out.

  • Existing overhead CCTV camera tracks people’s movements.
  • Camera feed connects to occupancy detection software. The ai-trained software counts the number of people in the designated area over the specified time, every minute say.
  • The occupancy counts are distributed to data dashboards on browsers or smart phone apps. They can also be sent to on-premises meters and digital displays. Counts can be combined from different areas.
  • Communication options include Wi-Fi, ethernet, LoRaWAN, internet of things. Meaning occupancy counts can be interconnected with other devices and sensors collecting, sharing and analysing data in real-time.
  • The software saves counts for historical analysis.

Compared to all other sensors, camera-based methods using computer vision provide the most accurate and fine-grained occupancy information.

Hao Lu in Indoor Occupancy Detection for Commercial Office Spaces Using Sparse Arrays of Time-of-Flight Sensors, 2023(2)

2. 3D Stereo People Counting

This technology utilises stereo vision to identify and count individuals. Two lenses capture images from different angles. By comparing these viewpoints, the unit can calculate depth and create a 3D image. This enables the technology to accurately determine the presence and movement of people in three-dimensional space. It requires specialised hardware and installation, rather than utilising existing infrastructure.

3. Passive Infrared Sensors (PIR)

A passive infrared (PIR) sensor measures infrared light radiating from objects in its field of view – such as people. The sensor comprises a pyroelectric sensor that detects levels of infrared radiation and a lens or mirror that focuses the infrared signals onto the sensor.

Binary PIR sensors just detect the presence or absense of a person, not how many people are in a space or their movement. They output a 1 for when motion is detected and 0 for no-motion. Modern signal-based PIR sensors produce an analogue signal which can give more precise information such as size of the moving item – a stronger signal indicating a larger object or someone moving closer. When used in conjunction with neural networks they can be used for occupancy counting, but their accuracy ranges from 80-90%3.

Not suitable for outdoor use.

4. Smartphone Counting – WiFi Probe Requests

Another way to count people is by using mobile signals: collecting Wi-Fi probe request signals from people’s smartphones. This though, has many privacy implications as it almost always involves processing personal data.

A person’s phone regularly sends a request to nearby networks to see to which it can connect. These probe requests contain data about all the networks the phone has previously found. This means that details of all the physical locations that the person has been to can be accessed. Linking this with other data means enables a person’s identity, home address, workplace, travel habits and so on to be deciphered. This method of counting and tracking people fails GDPR and all the regulations apply, including consent.

GDPR

Mobile operating systems now deploy randomisation to try to protect user privacy and the persistent hardware identifiers being tracked. But there are many phones in wide use that do not effectively prevent tracking. In addition, randomised MAC addresses may also be regenerated if a user doesn’t use a WiFi network for a prolonged time. Meaning a double-counting for occupancy purposes. Another problem is that the method assumes that a significant number of people are not carrying two Wi-Fi enabled devices (or indeed no Wi-Fi enabled devices).

5. Thermal Sensors

Thermal sensors employ thermal imaging of the monitored area. These images represent the heat signatures of objects in the environment. Image processing algorithms identify and differentiate human heat signatures from other heat sources like equipment or sunlight. Once human heat signatures are isolated, a counting algorithm tracks the movement of these signatures across defined virtual lines or zones within the monitored area. Each time a heat signature crosses a virtual line, it is registered as a count.

The advantages of these systems include that they are GDPR compliant, can operate in darkness and can cover a large area.

Their disadvantages are potential overcounting or undercounting due to overlapping sensing areas, sensitivity to environmental factors like temperature and airflow. They also might struggle to distinguish between closely spaced people.

6. Infrared Time-of-Flight sensors

These emit short pulses of infrared light and then measure the time it takes for the light to reflect off objects in their field of view and return to the sensor. Based on the time-of-flight measurement, the sensor can determine the distance to the object. These pulses are generated by a laser or LED source within the sensor.

The sensor builds up a 3D image of its surroundings by measuring the distances to multiple points. On-board processing then filters out static objects like furniture while tracking moving objects like people. The image allows the sensor to distinguish people from other objects based on size, shape and, in some cases, thermal signature. The sensor can then count the number of people within its field of view based on the identified and tracked human shapes.

Work across a wide range of light and temperature conditions. GDPR compliant. However, they might not be able to count occupancy accurately in crowded environments. They might be affected by surface reflectivity and the presence of obstacles in the detection area. May struggle in outdoor environments. They have a relatively large power consumption compared to conventional cameras (5).

7. Ultrasonic Sensors

Ultrasonic occupancy sensors work on the doppler shift principle. They emit high frequency sound waves and analyse their reflected frequency. The sensor registers a change in the frequency of waves occurring when a person moves. However, they can only detect that a room is occupied, not count the number of occupants.

Performance can be influenced by the acoustics of the environment, and by temperature.

8. Radar

Radar-based occupancy sensors work by transmitting radio waves and analysing the reflections to detect the presence and movement of objects, including humans, within a monitored area. When the reflected waves bounce back to the sensor, their frequency is slightly altered due to the Doppler effect. This shift in frequency provides information about the movement of the reflecting object. Based on the signal characteristics, the sensor determines if there’s movement within its range and classifies it as occupancy if the movement pattern aligns with human presence

9. Environmental Sensors

In an occupancy monitoring context, environmental sensors provide data by measuring human emissions like CO2 levels. However, these work more slowly than other methods and provide delayed results.

Find out more

References

1. Occupancy Counting, Retail Sensing. Accessed 9 May 2024
2. Lu, Hao, Indoor occupancy detection for commercial office spaces using sparse arrays of time-of-flight sensors 2023
3. Shokrollahi, A et al. Passive Infrared Sensor-Based Occupancy Monitoring in Smart Buildings: A Review of Methodologies and Machine Learning Approaches. Sensors 2024, 24, 1533.
4. Thomas Zerdick, Head of Technology and Privacy, European Data Protection. Pseudonymous data: processing personal data while mitigating risks. Accessed 9 May 2024
5. M. H. Conde et al, “Recent Advances in Computational Time-of-Flight Imaging,” 2023 57th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers

Retail Sensing

Retail Sensing manufacture the Video Turnstile people counting, vehicle sensing and smart city equipment. Our systems not only measure footfall and traffic, but monitor queues, display occupancy, track shoppers around stores, show heat maps of most visited areas, record passenger numbers, count pedestrians and provide retail intelligence and key performance indicators.

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *